case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-08-01 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #6052 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6052 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Etrian Odyssey III]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Apostle]

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #865.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2023-08-02 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
because John made his barons so mad they shifted the entire power structure and put it writing? That's pretty bad. For that reason, I'll give you Charles I as equally bad too.

Richard II would probably be remembered more badly if he hadn't had a mostly good reign, and his family hadn't descended into civil war within two generations with a much more mentally questionable king.

I said this before, but James II wasn't bad as such, he was just catholic. they probably wouldn't have even ousted him if his wife hadn't had a child, and a son at that (James' sisters spread rumors that the pregnancy and birth was faked in order to de-legitimize the child)