[ SECRET POST #6055 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6055 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04. https://i.imgur.com/aOA2fCC.png
[OP marked as NSFW/artistic depiction of characters with above the waist nudity]



__________________________________________________





























05. [WARNING for discussion of rape, homophobia]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

[Steven Universe]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape and CSA]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #865.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Huh that's so weird, normally a character being a victim of SA galvanises the fandom into giving them all the healing cock. Either way it doesn't matter as they're not real so who cares if people are writing porn about them.

[pantswarrior]

....That's pretty much what I was thinking. Almost all my fandoms have some character who has widespread fanon of past sexual abuse, and people are ALWAYS writing smut about them ("healing cock" variety or otherwise). I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that even the stories where it explicitly spelled out "this character survived sexual abuse" shouldn't contain healthy sexual content. o_o

[(Anonymous)]

I think it depends on the fandom, Some fandom tends to attract people who will say anything for their fave not be "sexualized". If this character wasn't a survivor, chances are that they would look for another reason for why it's problematic to write smut of them.