[ SECRET POST #6056 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6056 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #866.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

She did an interview in New Scientist in 2008 about how she categorized science fiction. And she wrote something about it in an essay collection about how she sees her books (speculative fiction, rather than science fiction). Then Ursula K. Le Guin had an article in The Guardian in 2009 reviewing a couple of Atwood's books, where she called Atwood's categorization an "arbitrarily restrictive definition designed to protect her novels from being relegated to a genre still shunned by hidebound readers, reviewers and prize-awarders. She doesn't want the literary bigots to shove her in the literary ghetto."

I got this from the Introduction in Atwood's In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination (https://books.google.com/books?id=8hOBecTcjtcC&pg=PA7#v=onepage&q&f=false)

[(Anonymous)]

Well Le Guin was a pompous, judgmental hack, so.

[(Anonymous)]

"Hack"?? No.

[(Anonymous)]

You get Ursula K Le Guin's name out of your filthy lying mouth.

[(Anonymous)]

What???

[(Anonymous)]

Shut up.

[(Anonymous)]

that meme which is "I'm not replying to that; that's someone with a fetish for being yelled at"