[ SECRET POST #6056 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6056 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #866.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Women don't have a prostate, but I'm not sure how fandom came to the conclusion that not having a prostate = not being able to find anal sex intensely arousing. For women also, the orgasms feel different, depending on what you're stimulating.

And here's where it also gets interesting: as far as I know, very few men can orgasm reliably from only anal penetration. Without paying any attention to their dick.

But I can certainly believe that writing like, "this doesn't work for you and you know it, but we'll pretend it works for this fictional character" is not conducive to getting horny. Which is exactly why I was saying that this wasn't a depiction of heterosexual sex as it is, so much as heterosexual sex as it was "supposed" to go. With penetration-only reliable orgasms.

As far as I'm concerned, nobody is guilty and none of this is wrong.

I'm well aware that it's been discussed to death. Often unjustly and unflatteringly. And every few weeks or months, someone trots the "women are fetishizing gay men by writing slash" allegation out somewhere in the comments on F!S. But I think you're misrepresenting what I said. And little of what I've read on the subject has seemed especially insightful to me. They seem more like theories driven by straight men finding the idea that women like slash uncomfortable, and wanting an explanation for that. And mostly coming up with "explanations" that are veiled criticisms. So, I reverse engineered an argument from what I know (and think) about enjoyable penetrative sex, and put it forward.