case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-08-09 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #6060 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6060 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Arknights]



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #866.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-08-10 07:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yup. Don't matter what your comment says, to the algorithm any comment is a good comment and shows engagement with the video. Get enough comments and you go further up the algorithm's recommendation list, even if the comments are all people screaming what an idiot you are. And since people are notably less likely to leave praise than a "werl achtuarly" comment, that means virtually every tuber makes at least one or two mistakes for their commentariat to correct them on per vid. The advice to do so is even, recursively, included on many "how to become a youtuber" youtubes. Never engage, even downvoting is recorded as engagement by the algorithm.

If you really want to harm a youtube vid, then watch about thirty seconds of it, then click back and forth at random points in the vid a couple of times watching about twenty-thirty secs each click, then back button. That is recorded by the algorithm as negative interactions, and the video sinks down the list.