[ SECRET POST #6065 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6065 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #867.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think the argument is more about US/Hollywood media being centered on the White narrative. Or at least, that is a fair criticism I see and I think is worth talking about.
But in terms of the individual film in question?
I mean...I agree that some people just want to be pissy and will use any topic to thread some form "gotcha" to make themselves feel superior while looking down on those who don't agree.

But that doesn't mean that the criticism is without merit.
Cuz Hollywood sure does love giving Nolan money to create whatever he wants and he sure loves telling tales of white dudes with emotions.

I get it. He's a white dude with emotions, duh.
But it reinforces this expectation that someone of Nolan's caliber is "outside" of talks about representation and systemic racism. We "can't" criticize him or his works.
"Failing to see his works for what they are is an individual problem, not a systemic one" is a take I can't wholly support. Sorry