fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #6069 ]

⌈ Secret Post #6069 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05. [SPOILERS for WFYO]

__________________________________________________

06. [SPOILERS for FFXVI]

__________________________________________________

07. [SPOILERS for Chibi Vampire, and for Blood and Chocolate]

__________________________________________________

08. [SPOILERS for Thirsty]

__________________________________________________

09. [SPOILERS for Resident Evil: Death Island movie and Resident Evil: Infinite Darkness]

__________________________________________________

10. [WARNING for discussion of ageism (per OP's note)]

__________________________________________________

11. [WARNING for discussion of underage/grooming]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #867.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

apples and pears. a wildly inaccurate biopic about Zuckerberg or Oppenheimer or even Anne Bolyn is, on some level, not equivalent with writing hockey players transforming into vampires and having kinky gay sex in a coffee shop. are they both fictional takes on real people? yes, but that's about the only place they match.

but to be fair, I'm not into biopics that are borderline fantasy anyway, nor am I into RPF. maybe for someone who voraciously consumes "based on a true story" soap opera dramas, the line between the two is far more blurry. it just seems disengenous to ask why someone doesn't like RPF (or RPS usually) but can still watch Oppenheimer.

[ SECRET POST #6069 ]

no subject