[ SECRET POST #6078 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6078 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #869.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Can you point out where someone said "it's no big deal"? Kids being bullies is bad, kids were always bullies, and it has always been bad.

It seems however that the point was that adult bullies are different from child bullies, which has not much to do with whether the kids are worse or better than they used to be.

Then someone said "no (they aren't different, because) children are worse than children used to be" but why is that relevant? How did "adult bullies and child bullies are fundamentally different" become an argument about whether children are worse now? Are you saying that makes them the same as mature adults? Why would it?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Personally, I disagree that there's THAT big a difference between teen and adult bullies. I suppose it's slightly more excusable when a kid does it (only slightly, mind you), but I don't think it's a fundamental one. The urge to bully comes from a dark and nasty place regardless of the age of the bully, and I don't think the impact on the victims is fundamentally all that different either.

[(Anonymous)]

As another anon said ITT - it doesn't matter at all if the bully is a child or an adult, not to the person getting bullied.