case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-09-15 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #6097 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6097 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Persona 5]



__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]



__________________________________________________





































05. [SPOILERS for Good Omens season 2]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of seuxal assault]





































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #871.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-16 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
Doesn't matter. People are allowed to leave bad reviews on books they don't like. The criminologist is in the wrong.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-16 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
If you read that as just "leaving honest but negative reviews because he didn't like the book" and not "deliberately trying to trash the books of a professional rival while hiding behind a not-so-anonymous username while simultaneously giving yourself 5 star reviews", I don't know how to help you, and I feel like I'm being generous in assuming you're sincere and not just deliberately opting for the willfully bad faith interpretation in order to be trollish yourself.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-16 07:37 am (UTC)(link)
I do not need to be helped because I hold a differing opinion from you.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-16 10:01 am (UTC)(link)
You opinion is noted, it's just that it's factually wrong.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-16 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
... did you miss the "giving his own books 5 star reviews" part because that's directly against Amazon's TOS