case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-09-17 02:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #6099 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #872.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

[personal profile] tabaqui 2023-09-18 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, you just don't get it. Dude, seriously. If you think these dogs would just go running madly, killing every human, if they weren't fucked up/badly trained by humans, you are nuts.

If you lost someone to a pit bull, I'm sorry for your loss, bit your double and tripling down on your 'hill' is ludicrous and kinda weird.

Know what dog we were all told to be terrified of when i was a kid? Dobermans. They were mad killers, totally aggressive, would attack at the slightest provocation. That wasn't true, but people trained them to BE aggressive, and they got that reputation. Suddenly, the doberman is out, the pit bull is in, and people DELIBERATELY train them to be aggressive. DELIBERATELY. And you want to punish the dog.

Would you also want to ban all sharks? Snakes kill double the amount of humans all dogs do - down with snakes! I know you don't see how silly you are, but trust me - others do.

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

(Anonymous) 2023-09-18 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Lol. Sure. Dobermans were the scarrrryyy dog for a while. But you know why they were not banned? Because statistically, they didn't and don't kill many people. It was all just movies. That is not the same for pits.

"Would you also want to ban all sharks? Snakes kill double the amount of humans all dogs do - down with snakes!"

Did you know you have to have a special permit in most places to have venomous snakes? Also, yes if people were breeding and letting venomous snakes (or sharks) roam around. And those sharks/snakes KILLED people? Yeah, I'd ban the breeding and owning of sharks and snakes. What a silly, silly analogy.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

[personal profile] tabaqui 2023-09-18 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
NOPE. Because you see the one thing there that is the same for both snake kills and dog kills? You said it yourself.

HUMANS.

It's. The. Owners.

Yeesh.

I'm so done.

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

(Anonymous) 2023-09-18 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
It's the owners. And the dog. And only one of those things can be outlawed.

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

(Anonymous) 2023-09-18 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Not according to republicans.

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

(Anonymous) 2023-09-18 07:30 am (UTC)(link)
But you have to wait until after they are born to make human life illegal. And that is where the cops come in.
cakemage: (Wolf pack!)

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

[personal profile] cakemage 2023-09-20 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Y'know, I certainly hope you're fighting just as hard to ban the Caucasian Shepherd.