case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-09-17 02:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #6099 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6099 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #872.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

Re: What are your controversial non-fandom opinions?

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2023-09-18 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying anything about the people you know, who I would hope are all wonderful parents, and frankly I don't have to because the individual data points are not what I'm talking about. That said, it simply doesn't follow that being able to love a child despite not sharing the child's DNA means that you are able to see that child as separate from your desire to have a child. The industry of adoption simply doesn't encourage this, and more importantly typically puts a price on adopting a child that affects how parents deal with non-typical behavior. Then there are the possession issues with cross-cultural adoption, including a literal black market for unwanted adoptees who aren't "perfect" because they tend to have traumatic experiences they need help with.

But yes, "children as possession" is also a terrible thought process that runs through society in general.