[ SECRET POST #6114 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6114 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #874.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I'm with you for the most part.

[(Anonymous)]

Seconding this. Tony Stark can toss out nicknames left and right and I'm eternally here for it. If a character is canonically shown to be nickname-happy, then it's fine, IMO.

Also, if two characters have never met in canon, or have never been formally introduced, then I may be okay with the use of nicknames, provided it feels IC for the nicknamer, and the nicknamee has an IC reaction to the nickname. Like, I was never an active Mystrade shipper, but I could totally buy Lestrade calling Mycroft "My" (setting aside the general linguistic awkwardness of using "My" as a nickname in written fiction, where if it falls at the beginning of a sentence, the reader won't immediately know it's a name).