Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-10-11 04:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #6123 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6123 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Kim Possible]
__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #875.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 12:32 am (UTC)(link)White Savior stories are just white people trying to reassure themselves they've done some trickle of good among the tidal waves of genocide, slavery, and rape of entire cultures that they're historically infamous for.
The trope would go over better nowadays if white saviors' stories acknowledged the reason black and brown people need to be "saved" in most instances is because of a system white people built to serve them and their white children and their children's children in perpetuity.
Although if the secret is referring to people accusing a story about a white person rescuing a family of PoC from a burning building of being 'White Savior-y,' then yeah, they have a point. That's not part of the trope, that's just someone being heroic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 12:47 am (UTC)(link)OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:09 am (UTC)(link)So much wasted potential! Kids these days. You've lost the art.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:27 am (UTC)(link)And you are an asshole. I don't usually call people names lightly, even on the internet, but you are. You are an asshole.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 02:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 02:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 02:57 am (UTC)(link)Ok, I've seen enough. I call troll. Stop being an asshole.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 04:57 am (UTC)(link)I don't think they were trolling. You may not agree with their views, but they are expressing themselves calmly and coherently while you most certainly are not. Why not respond to their actual points if you have a problem with their comment instead of this insipid counter-trolling?
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 11:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah. Seeing this particular form of ad hominen attack is beyond frustrating.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)But there's no discussion here. One person made a very cogent post, and another was being a dick about it. That's a troll.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)I define a troll as someone who's just tossing shit out there, not because they necessarily believe something, but because it will upset somebody else. Which benefits the troll in some way (on the lowest level, amusement... on the highest level, idk, maybe someone's paying them).
One can upset others without being a troll, by denying somebody else's view because acknowledging it at all would mean getting over one's own ego. Most don't enjoy being labeled the bad guy.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)The snark points to the intent to make the original poster mad. That's a troll.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)In my head I'm drawing hearts around this phrase.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)I don't know if OP means all white people are like this, but it actually doesn't hurt white people to acknowledge that they have been historically dicks to others. Of course, that doesn't mean other groups haven't been dicks to others, because multiple things can be true at the same time. But the problem is that instead of fixing the problem of being dicks, at least SOME white people will deny/misrepresent/cover up history so that white people don't feel bad that they might be related to some dicks. But that creates a problem where those white people unwittingly continue the deception and abusive systems, and any request to acknowledge something that runs counter to their worldview is met with denial or deflection. Because, that's not what they grew up with! How could it be true?
It's an awful feeling when people don't believe your story because it's "too much" for them.
If German kids have to learn about the Holocaust, I think other white people can handle learning that their ancestors weren't always the nicest people.
I don't really care if none of this makes sense to you, or if I've gone off a tangent or whatever. I just think that maybe you should be a better human. Others too, myself included. These topics are difficult enough to navigate without the goddamn snarkiness.
Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP? Is that the right tag? Newish here.
(Anonymous) 2023-10-12 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)