[ SECRET POST #6145 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6145 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 05 secrets from Secret Submission Post #878.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: I'm still trying to wrap my head around

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, that's an anti-choice strawman and fallacy. "Pro-choicers support eugenics because they think it's better for babies with defects to be aborted." This was literally what I was taught in Catholic school, albeit to give the school some credit, it was a softer version that didn't mention eugenics specifically, but did present the pro-choice stance as only being about sparing children from living with disabilities, and the argument against it being that being born with a disability is better than not having the chance to be born. They didn't say anything at all about the argument for the right not to give birth simply because you don't want a child at all; it was all about the child for them on both sides and not the pregnancy.

Re: I'm still trying to wrap my head around

[(Anonymous)]

It's not a strawman considering I personally know several people who are very much pro-choice but draw the line at situations they consider eugenics. I'm from Germany. We have a History with that.