[ SECRET POST #6163 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6163 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Five Nights at Freddy's]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #881.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Except, and this is the point you keep ignoring over and over again, there very much are plenty of cases where the comments were troll comments and obviously so. You keep denying the very possibility of that. And there are plenty of cases where people are wilfully misinterpreting secret because it fits their own agenda. Obviously you can't always tell 100% but it's very, very obvious in some cases. And again: why is it not okay when OPs make bad faith assumptions about commenters while it's okay when commenters make bad faith assumptions about secrets?

And oops, it's almost as if the usage of a certain word that gets used by a certain type of people on the internet gets you associated with that group. You should have known that considering you keep going on an on about commenters having all the right to interpret secrets in a certain way just because the wording is the same as that of particular groups so if you use terms of a 4chan brat it's gets you associated with that, shocking!

And the fact that you keep repeating that the OPs in question are calling EVERY negative comment a troll? That rarely if ever happens. Also, you don't even know if the person calling the troll is the OP in the first place because they sure as hell don't always indicate that. When they do? Sure. But they often don't.

[(Anonymous)]

Except, and this is the point you keep ignoring over and over again, there very much are plenty of cases where the comments were troll comments and obviously so. You keep denying the very possibility of that.

No. I dealt with that at the beginning of the discussion, where I said:

"If someone is name-calling immediately out of the gate, sure, call them a troll."

And there are plenty of cases where people are wilfully misinterpreting secret because it fits their own agenda. Obviously you can't always tell 100% but it's very, very obvious in some cases.

I'm sure there are, but there is no way for us to know. To assume from the get go that some comment is "wilfully misinterpreting" instead of having a different point of view, and to call them a troll or some other name is just letting everyone know that you're the asshole.

And again: why is it not okay when OPs make bad faith assumptions about commenters while it's okay when commenters make bad faith assumptions about secrets?

Go back and read my statements. I never said "It's perfectly fine to make bad faith assumptions about secrets BUT NEVER ABOUT COMMENTS!!" I have repeatedly said that you cannot assume bad faith just because you don't agree with it. This goes for both comments and secrets, but the secret we're having this discussion in is talking about comments, and the comment I responded to was also talking about comments, so the discussion is about comments. If you would like to discuss this for secrets, go start another thread.

And oops, it's almost as if the usage of a certain word that gets used by a certain type of people on the internet gets you associated with that group. You should have known that considering you keep going on an on about commenters having all the right to interpret secrets in a certain way just because the wording is the same as that of particular groups so if you use terms of a 4chan brat it's gets you associated with that, shocking!

What does that have to do with anything? What group do you want to lump me in with? The group that doesn't discuss waffles when the topic is pancakes?

And the fact that you keep repeating that the OPs in question are calling EVERY negative comment a troll? That rarely if ever happens.

It's happened at least twice in the last two weeks. So, sure, in the course of history, it rarely happens. But the secret that we're all responding to is talking about this specific "re-occurring theme". Which... which is why we're talking about it.... here. In the thread about the topic of secret posters being mad that commenters didn't read their mind...

Also, you don't even know if the person calling the troll is the OP in the first place because they sure as hell don't always indicate that

Which is why I said: "it's because someone (I think OP not admitting they're OP)". I don't know they are, I just think they are. Because I don't know, I'm not going to act as if they are OP. I'll just keep that suspicion in the back of my mind until they do it enough for me to feel more comfortable calling them on it.

Please go back and read more closely.

D+

[(Anonymous)]

The grading stuff makes you sound like a troll.