Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-11-20 07:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #6163 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6163 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Five Nights at Freddy's]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #881.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-11-21 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)Where did they say this?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-11-21 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)"Certain types of replies" = "dumb to the max bad faith takes" = "troll" IN THIS PERSON'S OPINION. It might not be "dumb to the max" or "bad faith." Could be earnest dumb to the max. Or could be really smart "bad faith" where they have a good point, but said it in a way to try to cause drama. Either way, it's all opinion on this anons part. Quite evident from the language used ("dumb" "bad" "to the max") that anon doesn't like the comment. From there they say "those were definitely intentional" with no basis or support for this statement. How are they definitely intentional? Does anon have access to the commenter's hidden villain monologue where they state outright their intention to troll? Can they read the commenter's mind?
How do they know the "dumb to the max bad faith" take is intentional?
Because anon finds them dumb. Anon doesn't like it = troll.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-11-22 01:15 am (UTC)(link)