case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-11-28 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #6171 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6171 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Alchemy of Souls]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #882.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question for gay/straight people

(Anonymous) 2023-11-29 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I wasn't speaking for all people: see all the use of "might" "may" "can" etc. I'm just trying to explain for OP that this is true for *some* people... because it is.

A straight dynamic doesn't necessarily mean roles only within the relationship, either. Someone may play all the stereotypical male roles and another might play all the stereotypical female roles but - like a lesbian or straight man might not want someone who wants to be referred to as their actual, serious romantic/sexual boyfriend/husband, and that instantly makes that person unattractive. Or a gay man or straight woman doesn't want someone who wants to be referred to as their actual, serious romantic/sexual girlfriend/wife.

This isn't only a social dynamic thing because this is a physical sexual turn-off to many people, in the same way that someone referring to their lover as "daddy/mommy" turns some people on but causes physical revulsion in others even if w/e not a single thing actually wrong with that between consenting adults.

Re: Question for gay/straight people

(Anonymous) 2023-11-30 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
>>I wasn't speaking for all people

UH... yeah. I know. I just wanted to share my experience. Because, as I said: shit is confusing.

I explicitly wrote [I don't think for me it's even the "straight dynamic" that turns me off.] Notice the use of "for ME" and "turn ME off". I was talking about myself... I wasn't debating you...

Sorry I used your comment to expand on it with my personal feelings/experience.
I didn't want to ruffle your feathers.