[ SECRET POST #6183 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6183 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Caligula, 1979]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #884.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

as someone who reads some really good authors but is annoyed when they have a specific secondary pairing they love and i hate which they never fucking mention in their tags, a lot of this is about fandom expectation so you're never going to please everyone, but it's definitely more polite imo when you put "background xyz" instead of just "xyz"

[(Anonymous)]

it's definitely more polite imo when you put "background xyz" instead of just "xyz"

This is the way.

[(Anonymous)]

It's funny how the classification of the secondary pairings' presence has fallen to the side in recent years. I recall people being a lot more mindful of tagging these other ships as background or implied or what have you, but nowadays it's like that detail doesn't even cross their minds. And it's such a simple thing to do, too! It benefits everyone. Weird how people lost that custom...