case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-01-03 06:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #6207 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Roommates]



__________________________________________________



04.
[Try Guys YouTube channel]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #887.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-01-04 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
I’m one of the people who noped out of SW after TLJ* and I absolutely agree.

Also, I think JJ Abrams was a bad choice of a replacement but that’s probably more of a me thing than anything objective. I grew to really dislike him the more he seemed to buy some of the hype that he was the Gen X God of Sci-fi and Nostalgia.

*I didn’t think the movie was so bad that it killed my love of Star Wars, it just made me be honest with myself that I’m an original trilogy fan. I think Star Wars fandom would be a better place if more fans recognised that they only like certain parts and stop trying to justify others not being as engaging for them.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2024-01-04 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, I get the sense in a lot of fandoms these days that a lot of at least the most vocal fans genuinely believe that their personal likes and dislikes are objectively good and bad. People aren't comfortable these days with just liking things and disliking things. They have to be objectively right about it. And then anyone who has different likes and dislikes is just wrong.

(Anonymous) 2024-01-04 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly, and they have to dress up their likes and dislikes as some kind of objective social social good in many cases, as well. It's exhausting.

(Anonymous) 2024-01-04 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
I am so tired of people who start crowing about things they dislike being 'objectively bad' or who claim reviewers that don't like the things they like 'aren't being objective.' Like: you keep using that word, 'objective.'I do not think it means what you think it means.

(Also maybe this is just me but I feel like I see this most often in male-dominated fan spaces? Most of the fans I've seen using the objective argument are Star Wars dudebros and anime fans mad that reviewers don't think ecchi and isekai are the greatest things ever. Female fans are more likely to argue that the thing they prefer is *morally* superior, while male fans keep using 'objective' as if to say that when you get rid of all that silly emotion you will see that logically their favorite shitty thing is amazing and the thing they hate is clearly the actual worst thing.)

(Anonymous) 2024-01-04 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
I think that's totally the right attitude to have. The Star Wars canon is so big and varied; there's something for everyone, and there's no obligation for everyone to like everything. You can take what you like and what you want from the smorgasbord, and leave the rest.