[ SECRET POST #6208 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6208 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #887.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

OP is not asserting they would be of similar sizes, or that there would be negligible size difference. OP is asserting the child bearers would be bigger.

This is basically a "Totally Rational Essay on why it only makes sense Logically if my guy tops" and everyone's just like bro, chill, we can kink on different things.

[ariakas]

Yeah that's fair, I mean there are primate species where females are larger, often thought to be tied to polyandrous behaviours, but the differences are pretty marginal compared to the sizes you see in the full-blown male-dominated 100% polygynous tournament species where males can be like, twice the size of the females or more.

If OP means Slightly Larger, sure. But then the omegas also have to beef with the other omegas a bunch and get around lmao