[ SECRET POST #6217 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #889.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Not trying to be mean, but I'm not sure you're coming to the right place. If you only want support, you're going to have to pick and choose what you post about and be very, very careful about how you word it, and even then, somebody will probably still have an opposing opinion. Also, some people very obviously do come here for a fight, some even actually state that in their secrets. Beyond that, I have to say I always assumed people realized when they posted a secret, they were inviting other people's opinions of it - good, bad, and ugly. I can get wanting people to agree with you, but expecting it from everyone, I don't get that. And I'm pretty sure ordering people to be nice is not going work.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, fuck off.

[(Anonymous)]

DA You are part of the problem.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think OP is expecting everyone to agree with them, I think they are expecting people who come here to give a good faith reading and nit be pedantic assholes rrleady to take the worst interpretation possible or just reply just for the sake of starting shit.

[(Anonymous)]

And then try out their freshly learned (insert subject)101 skills to support their bad faith readings just for the lulz and to feel smart.

[(Anonymous)]

Ah, good ol' meadowphoenix.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, she usually has good points even if I don't always agree with her.

[(Anonymous)]

To me, bad faith is less about the points someone makes and more about their attitude toward other people. She "lmaos" at and talks down to people who disagree with her. She's not out here to discuss; she's out here to convince herself of her own righteousness.

[(Anonymous)]

da

I tend to find her comments pretty insightful even when I don't share the same opinions. I've sometimes replied with disagreement and gotten interesting conversations out of it. That wasn't lessened by the use of "lmao" for me.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, it's totally possible to have interesting conversations with jerks that have overinflated egos. But that doesn't mean they're not still jerks with overinflated egos.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Naming users and bitching about them when they're not around to defend themselves seems kinda weird to me. Maybe talk it out with them privately? Or just accept that there are some people you're never going to agree with and carry on with your day?

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, they'll be here.

[(Anonymous)]

Uh... cool. I'd really love to have so little going on in my life that I devote this much energy to picking a virtual fight with someone I'll never meet. You do you, I guess.

[(Anonymous)]

But you're doing that right now, anon. You are here, picking a virtual fight with someone you don't know on an obscure online community, instead of doing something else.

[(Anonymous)]

Bad faith has a definition. It's when someone knowingly misrepresents something to gain some advantage; to purposefully deceive with malicious intent. Having a legit disagreement is not bad faith. Thinking a secret OP is an asshole is not bad faith. Being noticeably angry with someone in your comment is not bad faith. Replying "lmao" is not bad faith.

Making a comment assuming the worst possible interpretation, especially when there is textual evidence that you're wrong... THAT'S bad faith.

[meadowphoenix]

no i just give the same energy i'm getting. it's not surprising you have a problem with that.

[(Anonymous)]

That's not the case at all. I've seen people express themselves very civilly to you, and you're all LMAO at them. You do not respect people who have different views from you, no matter what "energy" they're giving.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

There are plenty of other regular posters here I don't agree with but whom I've had perfectly civil conversations with and we've agreed to disagree. meadowphoenix is not one of them.

[(Anonymous)]

I totally disagree fwiw, that hasn't been my experience at all or my feeling, the complete 180 in fact. It's a totally off-base thing to say as far as I'm concerned. We don't always agree at all but I've always felt it was possible to talk through the disagreements and I've found it really interesting and productive to see where and how we differ.

[(Anonymous)]

+1000

I've seen you act like a condescending dick on many occasions when someone disagreed with you.

[meadowphoenix]

oh it's definitely the case. but this is easily resolved on your first point (not easily resolved on the latter since i think it's highly unlikely you've read every thread of mine to be so certain that there disrespect regardless of the nature of the disagreement and since you're clearly dismissing anyone who says differently, which automatically disproves the last sentence there).

link a thread with a comment that is mutually intelligible as "civil" and a "disrespectful" lmao response from me.

[meadowphoenix]

lmao bb, just @ me

[(Anonymous)]

Same anon. God look at all those typos. This is why I normally don't participate here when only on my phone.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

That's not how the 'just here as a support group for stuff we cannot otherwise say in our fandoms' part of the secret reads to me, but maybe you're right.

[(Anonymous)]

Only the trolls from E.F. put up a fight with struggling people to torture them instead of help them.