[ SECRET POST #6237 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________















































02. [SPOILERS for Slow Horses season 3]




__________________________________________________



03. [WARNING for discussion of rape/non-con in fiction]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for inevitable discussion of JKR]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships, etc]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of non/dub-con]

[Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves]












































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #891.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I've heard of antis claiming Lolita is actually pedo porn because they take the unreliable narrator being a pedo at face value. Tells me they haven't read the damn book. Or know that the original author specifically requested printers/publishers NOT to put a picture of a little girl on the cover.

[(Anonymous)]

And the thing is that even in his unreliability, he manages to grasp a sliver of the reality of the situation. He knows that what he did was fucked up, and that he stole her childhood from her.

I wonder if part of the problem is the film adaptations. I haven't seen the Kubrick one, but I saw the one from the '90s with Jeremy Irons before I read the book, and it definitely paints a different picture. The acknowledgement of his wrongdoing is more muted, and he's portrayed as much less of an asshole than how he appears in the book.