case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-02-16 06:35 am

[ SECRET POST #6250 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.
[Death Note]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #893.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Character AI Anon from the other day

(Anonymous) 2024-02-16 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Half?!
You are full of shit omg.

Most of people told you that even as a springboard you are shooting yourself in the foot because you consider NLPs good characterization.

Re: Character AI Anon from the other day

(Anonymous) 2024-02-16 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Precisely. An anon above mentioned "reading" as something that got worse with time assuming it was the people who answered who couldn't read but it seems it was less them who have an issue with reading and more the person who asked about using AI in the first place... Even if it's just "as a springboard for ideas", that's still Not Writing as writing involves trying to have those ideas for yourself in some way and quite often struggling to find them. It's part of the process. Delegating that to a machine IS refusing to partake in something that is part of the general process of writing. It shouldn't be this hard to grasp, lmao.

Re: Character AI Anon from the other day

(Anonymous) 2024-02-16 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup, it seems that writer anon has less reading comprehension. Most people were positive just recommended against overusing bots in a long run.