[ SECRET POST #6252 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6252 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #894.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

A 48 year old man and a 35 year old woman is not a bad age gap at all by Hollywood's standards! And it's not like the characters' age gap is consistent and always the same in the source material.

I don't necessarily love the Pascal casting just because I don't know if he's right for the way I see the part; Pedro Pascal is very warm and Reed isn't, always. But for Pete's sake, it's not typical Hollywood. Typical Hollywood would have been casting a 23 year old, not a fucking 35 year old.

[(Anonymous)]

I would have thought the age gap is too small. They're MEANT to be a weird, unfashionable couple - Reed, brilliant but undiagnosed, Sue, relaxed but older than her years after raising her little brother.