[ SECRET POST #6263 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6263 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #895.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This week, Logic Challenged Anon tackles the immortal question: are apples actually oranges?

I know what you're trying to do. You're trying to argue that the "slippery slope" of, "antis going after X content will lead to the banning of Y content" is fallacious. But you're overlooking a few things: first, there are, in fact, some real and documented "slippery slopes," and they often involve speech; second, there are arguments in favor of a laissez-faire attitude toward speech that don't involve the slippery slope at all; and third, the issue at hand is not speech, but monetization, which involves an entirely separate set of considerations. What counts as ethical when expression alone is on the table is not necessarily ethical when money is exchanging hands.