case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-02-29 05:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #6264 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Fandom: Tiān Guān Cì Fú/Heaven Official's Blessing
Ship: Beefleaf (Shi Qingxuan and He Xuan)]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Music, Drake/Kendrick Lamar beef, What's the Beef? Youtube channel]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[X-Files s04e10, "Paper Hearts" ]



__________________________________________________



08.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #895.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2024-03-01 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
I don’t think the plagiarism argument applies until and unless it can actually reproduce your work. Right now it’s an incoherent mishmash only useful for concept art or Tumblr shitposts.

I also agree with basically everything Morlock Holmes says about AI art, e.g.https://morlock-holmes.tumblr.com/post/737826171981529088/okay-ai-art-is-art-agreed-sure-how-ethical-is
luxshine: (Default)

[personal profile] luxshine 2024-03-01 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't say it plagiarized (Although certain AI programs can and have recreated an original artist's art almost perfectly depending on the prompt, especially when you get "in the style of" prompts. I've seen a lot of people try to pass AI images as Artgem originals, for example, because yes, the rendering is VERY similar, and Artgem is one of the artists whose work was fed wholesale without permission to those programs.

Morlock Holmes is wrong, by the way, using the same arguments that confuse programming and mathematical prediction for intelligence and learning. And I guess all the publishers that have been called out for using AI 'art' on their book covers, or the people who have published books done completely with AI, agree that it's far more than just "for Tumblr shitposts"