[ SECRET POST #6264 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Fandom: Tiān Guān Cì Fú/Heaven Official's Blessing
Ship: Beefleaf (Shi Qingxuan and He Xuan)]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Music, Drake/Kendrick Lamar beef, What's the Beef? Youtube channel]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[X-Files s04e10, "Paper Hearts" ]



__________________________________________________



08.

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #895.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[luxshine]

There's absolutely no creative work in AI. A ton of artists have been trying to explain this to everyone. How the algorithm only recreates things based on the pixels it was fed, without any thought or learning because it CAN'T learn. It's programmed to to that, and without the work of humans, it's worthless.

Your analogy is wrong because, no matter my personal feelings about, say, the quality of JKRowling's writing and personal ethos, she didn't copy full paragraphs of The Worst Witch (And Books of Magic) to write Harry Potter. No matter how similar her work is to other previous work, it is still her writing, and her mistakes. AI takes the work and reproduces it, at times, verbatim. There was a HUGE scandal of an idiot programming an AI thing to reproduce the style of Kim Jung Gi not two weeks after his death, for example, and the thing was just doing that: copying Kim Jung Gi work and 'predicting' through programming how Jung Gi Would PROBABLY drawn a prompt. The thing is this: a Human copying and studying the work of Kim Jung Gi? Would also add their own experience to the work, and hopefully evolve into his own style. AI can't do that. It's not "Intelligence", it's a mathematical algorithm. And that mathematical algorithm was fed work that was stolen -bootleged if you prefer- from real human artists. Not, say, a hundred thousand "How to draw anime" books, studying the masters, trying to get WHY they put that pixel where they put it and reproducing it. Also, consider that a LOT of the people complaining ARE creatives themselves. In fact, MOST of the voices against AI are artists themselves. So the idea that we don't understand how "Creative process works" it's more than a bit insulting.