[ SECRET POST #6270 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6270 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #896.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not opposed to books having trigger warnings, though I'm used to them not. After all, I'm used to film and television having not only a rating but a brief 'for sexual content' or 'violence' to contextualize why one thing is for a more adult audience than another. When I recommend books I've enjoyed to people, I will often give an idea of the tone or if there is content that might be triggering-- or just that I think people might need to go into in the right mood.

I do NOT love the idea of writers worrying so much about people coming after them for problematic content that the trigger warning will do the opposite of improving things for readers, though-- instead of being warned for content that was there, feeling hypervigilant the entire time for something that never happens.