case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-03-06 06:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #6270 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6270 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #896.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-07 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's usually less insulting to assume someone is speaking in good faith, even if they've said something that seems dumb, then to assume they're lying or being deliberately antagonistic.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-07 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd find it more insulting if someone assumed I was genuinely going "have trigger warnings have gone too far??? (heavily implied yes)" over a single warning in a single book, but we can agree to disagree, I guess.