case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-03-20 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #6284 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6284 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Kelela]



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #898.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
erinptah: (Default)

[personal profile] erinptah 2024-03-21 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
If the royal family's PR department had a bunch of original, unedited shots of Kate being fine and available for photos...surely they would have released literally any of those by now?

There's no reason not to. The point of releasing the shopped version in the first place was "demonstrate to the public that Kate is fine and available for photos," right? Not "demonstrate that our photographers can get one shot where nobody blinked."

(Anonymous) 2024-03-21 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Eh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_complain,_never_explain

I mean, sure, they could just post all the candid shots but that wouldn't really stop people from concocting weirder and weirder theories because they (like you) don't like the simple, boring answer that someone maybe edited their family pic to look better.
erinptah: (Default)

[personal profile] erinptah 2024-03-21 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
I don't have any theories, and I don't care which answer is true. Subthread OP just asked why there was a fuss if the contents of the picture weren't inherently scandalous, so I told them.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-21 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
Original commenter: none of that equals the photo being scandalous or nefarious. It was stupid to release it instead of a picture of her when one of the kids was a baby, or something like that if there was nothing new to share, but stupid does not always equal sinister.