case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-04-09 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #6304 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6304 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #901.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
80% sure this is the "AO3 is child porn" anon. They're being daring tonight in jumping in for a different gripe with AO3 rather than their usual troll.

(AO3 DOES have a "show only crossovers" and robust search system that makes it relatively easy to find crossovers, but I'll agree that lumping crossovers and non-crossovers together means that finding them requires a few more steps, esp for rare crossovers)

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt - ohh that makes the comment make sense for me, so ty. I honestly hadn't made the connection and the comment seemed so random.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Really?

Considering all the criticism AO3 has gotten over the years - me pointing out that its not built for listing crossovers (unless you find great joy in wading through all those 50+ tagged fandoms full of one sentence stories collections); and just wishing that AO3 had a similar page that worked the same way as the one on FFnet - is up there with the 'Ao3 is child porn' anon???

Dude, AO3 gets updated all the time and sometimes adds functions to it. and I look forward to those functions - unless they suck, which I guess they never do since you believe that AO3 can do no wrong and must be an evil anti in some way.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
I think it was the tone

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
Well I can 100% believe they're tone deaf and incapable of reading.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Are you the original poster in this thread? Then it's not you who's being called out as child porn anon, but the one who replied to you ("yet another strike against AO3" anon). Probably because of the prosecution complex shining through.