case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-04-09 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #6304 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6304 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #901.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
I hope so, too. It really seems like this is a new way to exploit one's children and at best, it's just way too much exposure for minors who cannot consent and cannot understand what the repercussions might be when they're older.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-10 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
+1. Franke is a particularly awful case but I think all earnings of a minor (youtube, acting, whatever) should be put straight into a trust for the child, not administered by the parents, and they can only use the money for strictly limited things like education until the child is 18 and owns the trust.