[ SECRET POST #6321 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6321 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Lark Rise to Candleford]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships]

[Five Nights at Freddy's]


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #903.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

You don't seem to understand what the issue is here. If there happens to be a vagina in a m/m sex scene, people would like the vagina to not always be the main feature in the sex. They would like the vagina haver to do things you don't normally see vagina havers do in M/F sex. Cause this is M/M sex.

But you're arguing that that is bad and sexist. Which is weird, because you seem to think that if one person has a vagina, the sex must be thing-into-vagina. That's, um... very biological existentialism of you, totes-not-a-terf anon....

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

No, I don't think the sex *must* be thing-into-vagina. Hell, there are a bunch of ways to have sex that don't involve penetration at all! What I'm arguing is that thinking a trans man *must* have a dick of some sort, and must put that dick in something, is essentialism; and that thinking a trans man is somehow less of a man, somehow still a woman, if he has PIV sex, as if womanhood is completely defined by having a vagina and manhood is completely defined by having a penis, is sexist. I don't see any way around that.

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

If a trans man with a vagina is the only one ever to get dick inserted, and only ever into his vagina, as well as an extreme attention to the trans dude with the vagina getting eaten out/fingered in his vagina then it's essentialism to the max because obviously, the author thinks that the only way to ever have sex with a female bodies person, no matter their gender identity, is by focusing on the vagina. Which is cissexist.

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

The fuck is a "female bodied person?"

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

Don't pretend to be more stupid than you are, it's not a good look.

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

It's not stupidity at all. You're out here using TERFy phrases, and expecting not to have it pointed out? Come the fuck on.

Re: Based on 7

[(Anonymous)]

Lol it's cute the way you keep throwing the Terf thing at anyone who doesn't agree with you because you lack actual arguments. A pre-op trans dude has a female body, wether you like it or not. Otherwise, he wouldn't be trans.