case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-05-16 07:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #6341 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6341 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Happy Saint Sheol]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #906.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Just read the wiki page summary. What the fuck.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I also read a couple reviews. Ewww. Stinks of experimental art films.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-16 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
What is the controversy and what is littles and age play? And what is the fandom? Basically I have no idea what is going on here. I am completely lost.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-16 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
The movie is Poor Things so that is the fandom. I think it might be because the main character is a baby's brain in an adult body (initially). So kind of age play-y if you you squint and side eye it.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-16 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel even more lost than before the explanation now, but thank you for trying.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-16 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
What are you confused about exactly, I can try again.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
Littles is adults acting as babies/children/teenagers - not necessarily as a sexual fetish, though it's usually in a Littles/Caretaker dynamic with a partner. Age play is definitely a sexual kink of at least one partner pretending to be younger or older than they really are.

I dunno anything about this movie or fandom.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Littles - generally speaking a trope where people are classified as Littles (will have mentality of a child) or Bigs (regular adult). Almost exclusively non-sexual.

Age-Play - could include above, could be people roleplaying as child and caregiver, could be sexual or non-sexual.

Poor Things - a movie where a woman in an adult body has the mind of a baby and has lots sex with adult men.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh,t hat plot summary. I had no idea what this movie was about and now I wouldn't touch it with a 100 ft. pole.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
to be clear, as I understand it it's not like. in favor of what happens

thay doesn't necessarily make it good obviously. just saying.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
I mean there is more to it than that...but yeah. Huge disappointment.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Lol! Honestly, good question. I feel like it probably doesn't actually fulfill the kink for most people who are into littles/age-play. But I'd be interested in hearing what people who are into those kinks had to say.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say I'm part of ageplay or Littles fandom or groups, but I do like to read the kink/trope if its done in a certain way. Having said that...Poor Things creeped me the fuck out. I hated it.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
Oh god I hated this movie. It was my friend's turn to pick a movie to see and she wanted to see it because it was apparently a 'feminist' movie. I don't know who thought that but it gave me the almighty ick.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
I looked it up when it started getting hype during awards season. I guess, in a way, it's an exploration of identity and agency, but, damn, it's so full of do not want for me.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
I went in knowing nothing about it but as a massive fan of the director. Crashingly disappointed in it, but I really like thinking about why it didn't work. It does feel reductive to be like 'lol look at this man trying to be femnist' but... female liberation through heterosexual sex & socialism is so fkn funny, like it truly does feel like every right-on dude I hung out with in my 20s got together and made a movie

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
It’s honestly terrible and the people who think it’s super feminist or progressive are not my kind of people. The best way Ive heard it described is that it’s for people who carry an NPR tote bag.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Hey now, I am a big NPR nerd and I hated this movie. Lets leave public radio out of this.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-17 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
hahaha I liked that movie and NPR puts me the fuck to sleep.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2024-05-17 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)
it read to me as like someone who had just discovered second and third wave feminism, and had to tell someone.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-20 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
To me, a Caregiver who has done sexual AND non-sexual ageplay with other Littles... it's fucking gross. Because that's a *whole child* in a grown woman's body, not a whole grown woman *pretending* or *consensually regressing* to a child-like state.