case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-05-29 05:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #6354 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6354 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Midsomer Murders]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #908.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2024-05-30 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
you've met and talked with them or are you making an assumption because you believe TS's fandom or any fandom is Like That?

idk quite know how to respond, because i think i'm saying something more specific which is not that people shouldn't think about what their actions morally do, but that actually acting morally requires more than rote didacticism like "listening to bad people is bad". i think you need to have your own base foundational philosophy that you've thought about before you go trying to apply it to reality with rules, not the other way around.

Especially in a world where we're told
this is actually an interesting bit of limited perspective, since the world is mostly saying that you should buy more to make yourself happy and the moral limitations are far more niche that this phrasing assumes.