case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-06-25 06:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #6381 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6381 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #912.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-06-26 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
For me, even if I could look past all the other concerns, the environmental impact of AI is reason enough to reject it wholesale. No creative artform is worth pissing away reservoirs of water and exacerbating climate failure.

(Anonymous) 2024-06-26 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
i see chatgpt used even by the most veteran people in my work field, given the garbage fire that google has become and when they need ideas or templates to go, on top of the fact it's free. for a lot of people, it's simply not on their minds, especially if they need something done quick.

one of the possibilities i've read about this issue, is that the cost of AI is passed onto the company as a tax, and then to the user. you want to create an image and spend all of that processing power and water? fine, but you, the user, are paying everything that water costs, which is money the company has to pay to the town whose water is being used.

apparently towns are becoming hesitant as all hell to house anything regarding ai for the water they need, so it's the only case in which enshittification that may actually help people instead of ruining things.

and that's not even getting into the whole copyright mess, which is something openai is being put over the coals for.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2024-06-26 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
People keep saying the reason data centers use so much energy is because of AI, but they’ve been energy hogs since before it really took off: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/06/is-generative-ai-really-going-to-wreak-havoc-on-the-power-grid/