[ SECRET POST #6389 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #913.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think they can do no wrong, but I don't trust the source of all these claims. When they fervently defend fucking GHILSAINE MAXWELL and one of them has been trying to start beef with Gaiman for a LONG while on Xitter, and the other is the sister of someone who has been going after David Tennant for being a trans ally, it's REALLY hard to trust them when they're the ONLY source.

Especially when they can and WILL toss raped women under the bus for people like Rachel Johnson's brother were HE being accused.

If another source reports on this, fine, but until then, I'm wary of trusting the source and giving the signal to right wing batshit people that they can create claims like this with little proof or backing to take out trans allies and political enemies, some kind of silver bullet they've been wanting for DECADES at this point. And people who are progressive, too afraid of being seen as anti-feminist instead of rightfully going, "Hey uh this source is a little sus?", are falling all over themselves to suck the proverbial teats of these people. No one's saying he couldn't have done it--just that we don't trust the damn source and would rather wait to get our pitchforks and torches for when or if there's someone BESIDES real live actual fucking Ghilsaine Maxwell supporters who would sell every woman not them and their privileged allies to Satan for a single corn chip. And it's INCREDIBLY naive to think they WOULDN'T lie about this, too!

[(Anonymous)]

This isn't about you personally, this is about how a big part of progressive circles behave and have behaved in similar situations. I would know, I'm in those circles and I've seen it first hand. I just really hate double standards and I've seen this happen far too often. The thing is, nobody here is arguing that you should 100 % believe them. But at the same time, 100% dismissing the claims is also not the correct way, just because you disagree with them/they're assholes, especially if you would otherwise be disinclined to doubt claims made by someone who also wants to damage a political opponent but stands on your side of the political spectrum.

[(Anonymous)]

So if Breitbart released something about how Biden is sekritly a pedophile, they totes have proof, and was the only source, you'd suddenly believe it?

[(Anonymous)]

Which part of "nobody here is arguing that you should 100 % believe them" do you not understand? Is this too many words for your pea sized brain or...?

[(Anonymous)]

But people ARE believing them. They want to err on the side of caution. "Believe the victims." You can say "no one is believing them 100%" but the second you add a but, you're telling me you'd give the equivalent of a gossip mag talking about the latest hot celeb couple getting a divorce for the fifteenth time (they've gotten none) the time of day.