[ SECRET POST #6389 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6389 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #913.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Entertainment news (warning for discussion of sexual assault)

[(Anonymous)]

It's still a pretty big leap. Yeah, it's gross, but like... It's a pretty big leap, especially when one of the people accusing him and saying they have deets supports fucking Ghilsaine Maxwell. Forgive me for thinking she has the best interests of anyone at heart here.

NAYRT

[(Anonymous)]

It’s actually not a big leap. How much agency did the nanny have against her rich and famous employer who came onto her? General consensus in most western societies (and the legal decision in many) is that she had little to no agency. quid pro quo is assumed and an employer doesn’t have to verbalize a threat against an employee’s job because it’s baked in.