case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-07-28 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #6414 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6414 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #917.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-07-29 08:15 am (UTC)(link)
No that's comparing apples and oranges. There's being attracted to more than one or the different sex than depicted, which can actually be very true, just like a lot of bi people still have a preference for one sex over the other and date more in that direction, and then there's having an entirely different gender identity than depicted without even a single hint in that direction. So no, it's not the same.
Especially since the vast majority of trans headcanons are actually for characters who are already at least socially transitioned (like some dude being actually a trans man or a woman being a trans woman), in which case it becomes "entirely different body than depicted in canon" which, again, makes it a very shaky headcanon at best. So no, almost no characters can be argued to be anything other than cis if not implied otherwise in canon.

(Also, if you have no intention or wish to transition you ain't trans, sorry not sorry.)