[ SECRET POST #6444 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6444 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 20 secrets from Secret Submission Post #921.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's more misogynistic, or at the very least sexist, if you have a good-sized number of villains and none of them are female. Either you think women aren't capable of doing wrong, aren't powerful enough to be a viable threat, or are uncomfortable with a female villain because unlikable women cross the line too far into unlikability: unlikable men are interesting, unlikable women are too offputting.

[(Anonymous)]

Some people just don't understand that benevolent sexism is still sexism.
Same when all the droves of mooks you kill in video games are all male.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

Female villains who have a big impact on the plot and are regarded as powerful figures in-universe is something I usually enjoy in my fandoms...