[ SECRET POST #6492 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6492 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #928.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

IDK to me, this is kind of like...well, have you considered that you are free to express your opinions, but why is your expectation for the person you're responding to to react in a way you would prefer?

Not saying those who respond with negativity/defensiveness are "right" to react the ways they do, but IMO in these situations there is no right or wrong party.
Someone made a comment, someone else responds to engage in conversation. How that plays out is dependent on the personalities of parties involved.
IMO having been on both sides of such discussions, it tends to be clash of POVs.

I tend to choose to stop engaging if I feel like the person I'm engaging with is being antagonistic/smug. Because it's either, you want to get to know my POV or you think I'm wrong and you want to prove me wrong.
And I hate being placed in win/lose situations when that wasn't my intent at all (as the comment creator or as the respondent).

If I want nuance, I will engage when I want that.