[ SECRET POST #6498 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6498 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Pillars of Reality]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #929.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Crime question

[(Anonymous)]

Animal abuse. Because having those things done on one human would be totally worth it to make sure no animals were ever abused again.

Re: Crime question

[(Anonymous)]

But if the crime is animal abuse, you have to abuse that person's animal.

Re: Crime question

[(Anonymous)]

Comment just said you had to do it to the person. So I'd do the thing to the human, then protect all the animals.

Re: Crime question

[(Anonymous)]

But the crime is animal abuse, not abuse in general. Harming a person is not animal abuse. You would have to harm an innocent persons animals.

Re: Crime question

[thewakokid]

No, you'd have to do it to the animal. If you did it to a person that'd only get rid of assault.

Re: Crime question

[(Anonymous)]

Okay. Wording wasn't clear.

Re: Crime question

[thewakokid]

Guess not, mea culpa.