[ SECRET POST #6505 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6505 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Only Murders in the Building]



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #930.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

IDK what we mean by deconstruction anymore such that this is true.

[(Anonymous)]

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Deconstruction

Even the tropes page points out that it's trends bleak but doesn't have to be.

[(Anonymous)]

I understand the literal definition of what deconstruction is - but if that's the meaning we're using, I don't think it's true that there's this endless array of deconstructions that are also super grimdark.

[(Anonymous)]

Well it is, so you're wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

No, people just assume anything gritty and dark is a deconstruction.

[(Anonymous)]

No, you're still wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

You sound like a child?

+1

[(Anonymous)]

I don't usually tvtropes but I glanced over the article; the inherent description is "exploring how else the world might be in the existence of such a factor" i.e. if you can create food and water why aren't you solving world hunger. By that metric, deconstructing a happy kids' cartoon series does not automatically mean making it grimdark, and anyone who insists that genuinely exploring the plot holes would turn even Wizard of Oz into a dystopian nightmare is wholly missing the point.

but then, idk what OP's experience is, nor what ayrt is getting at by being contrarian with no context. I'm with you anon.