case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-10-27 03:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #6505 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6505 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Only Murders in the Building]



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #930.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-10-27 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
It really depends on if you believe photo manipulation is erasure or not. Altering a photo of a person? Not cool. Altering a movie poster? Probably not erasure. Altering a movie poster to tie it to the source material? Definitely not erasure.

This doesn’t mean erasure doesn’t happen nor is it saying erasure isn’t a vile thing. But this wasn’t that. The movie poster always should have copied the musical poster and it’s incredibly stupid that it didn’t. And her reaction was equally stupid because she falsely claimed erasure AND overlooked the fact that the image was heavily edited by the studio.