[ SECRET POST #6542 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6542 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #935.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Questions for Specific Professions

[(Anonymous)]

Do criminal defense attorneys know when their clients are guilty, and how do they justify o themselves defending them (morally, religiously, ethically, whatever) when they have undoubtedly committed heinous crimes (murder, child abuse, SA). I know this all sounds incredibly naive.

Re: Questions for Specific Professions

[philstar22]

Criminal defense attorneys believe in the system. If even the worst criminal can't have all the legal protections of the law, then it would easy to take it away from the innocent too. With the worst crimes where there is a lot of evidence, more often than not the attorney is focusing on getting a lesser sentence, not necessarily on getting their client fully off. But mostly they just believe in the system and that everyone should get to be defended in court.

I'm not sure I could do it personally. Then again I could never be a prosecutor either. And I really admire the public defender attorneys personally.