Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-12-23 03:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #6562 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6562 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #938.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-23 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-23 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)if OP had meant "heteronormative power imbalance between men and women bad" I would think they were intelligent enough to say so
unless you're implying they weren't, and said something totally not what they meant?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-23 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)I can't parse what you're saying here, sorry.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 03:01 am (UTC)(link)I think they meant that if the OP had meant to say "people are criticizing M/F ships because they say men always have an advantage over women and so it's impossible to have het relationships where the man is not abusing the woman," they would have said that.
Some people become unable to express themselves without academese, and then pretend there's something wrong with you if you can't figure out jargon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)and "power imbalance" a different enough thing from "men bad" that it'd make no sense to substitute one for the other like the first anon is implying the OP did
so to say "OP meant this totally other thing that isn't what they said" is either kinda dumb, or assuming OP is dumb
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)It's not reasonable to accuse someone who can't automatically translate these terms of not being able to understand what they read. They are not self-explanatory or universally known.
The rest of your point, I'd agree with. Yes, they're different arguments and no, the suggested one is not equivalent to what the OP said.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-25 02:08 am (UTC)(link)Then they were fucking morons. Those are not "pretentious college words", that's a fairly commonly used and self-explanatory phrase. Just because some people are idiots that can't understand any words with more than two syllables doesn't make the words pretentious.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-12-24 03:16 am (UTC)(link)And yeah, I've seen it abused to justify ridiculous arguments too. People are never going to quantify all the ways that one person can have an advantage over another, and even if they did, it wouldn't justify assuming the relationship is abuse. I swear, the more people focus on blind insistence on sameness, the farther removed from reality their predictions and prejudices get. All in the name of fighting oppression.