[ SECRET POST #6567 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6567 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I know someone like this who only goes for "taken" men because that makes them more desirable. It never works out well for anyone, and yet she does it again and again. I wouldn't call her a "homewrecker" because it's not like they can't say no, but I do think the guys in question are pretty stupid because every time they think she's not going to do the exact same thing to them five minutes later.

[(Anonymous)]

I dunno, seems like homewrecker would apply equally to both parties as opposed to only the guy in this situation. Like if it were once and she planned to stick with the guy, you might have a point. When it's multiple times it's not like she doesn't know what she's doing and how it'll end up

[(Anonymous)]

Oh yeah, equally applied I'm fine with, I just get annoyed when the previously single woman always gets the label and the cheating man doesn't.

[(Anonymous)]

I would absolutely call her a homewrecker. That's the definition of going after taken men or women.

That doesn't absolve the taken person for being a disloyal piece of shit, but if you KNOW someone has a spouse or partner, that make you homewrecking trash.

[(Anonymous)]

da

First of all, I've never heard a man shamed or taken to task like this for trying to convince a married woman to leave their spouse or have an affair. Literally, never. "Homewrecker" is an extremely sex-specific insult.

Second of all, as a concept, homewrecking is nonsense. If your partner will jump at the first person who flirts with them, they're not that interested in being your partner. And, sooner or later, someone will flirt with them, whether it's someone who likes finding out if they're looking at strong relationships or flimsy ones, or someone who genuinely is smitten with your spouse for whichever reason. Society just encourages women to pretend this is a moral failing on the part of other women, and ignore the fact that the only two people who agreed to act a certain way are the ones who got married in the first place.