[ SECRET POST #6585 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6585 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Stardew Valley]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #940.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

05. https://i.imgur.com/4GXisch.jpeg

[(Anonymous)]

This is like the Mona Lisa of secret designs. Wow, secret maker. WOW

[(Anonymous)]

I haven't seen anyone complaining about text behind images for months.

[randomdrops]

I was thinking I've only seen it once or twice. But I don't come here every day so who knows.

[(Anonymous)]

I did on one about oh, 3 weeks ago or so, but it was definitely the first/only one in at least a year. And I complained because this secret is wrong: it was unreadable and had no context clues to help figure out what it was even saying. A letter or two is fine if weird from a design perspective but crucial nouns and/or verbs up to half a sentence here and there? Nah.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Yeah I remember one about some sort of anime series? Where all the comments were like "we have no idea what this is saying"

Context clues didn't help anyone parse things when the key words were covered

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, no context clues are going to help when it's missing half of a secret.
Also I don't understand why we should bother at all

[(Anonymous)]

I remember one that had beads or something draped all over the text and seemed completely unrelated to the actual secret.

[(Anonymous)]

This secret pinging ye old trypophobia for anyone else? Not too awful, but just a twinge. Sometimes when it's a low level gross I can't help but stare and lean into the unsettled feeling to try and pinpoint why my body is reacting like this. It's the strangest feeling/reaction and I find it so curious.

[(Anonymous)]

Not tripping mine. I think the holes have to be more uniform in order to disgust me.

[(Anonymous)]

didn't trigger mine

[(Anonymous)]

Not mine. I think it's too big and uneven.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I get what you mean. It doesn't bother me much, like you, but I do get that slight twinge. Funny what sets it off, very arbitrary sometimes.

[randomdrops]

Only vaguely for the circles that are over the person.

[(Anonymous)]

Is this going to be the start of another round of illegible or flat out unreadable secrets?

[(Anonymous)]

This is probably the person who made those secrets and is still pissy about it, so probably.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm sorry I like to be able to read the secrets.

[(Anonymous)]

please go away

[(Anonymous)]

I can kind of get the complaints, because artsy secret design is one thing, but... why not just make it so all the text is visible? What is there to be gained from obscuring any part of it? I've seen so many fabulously designed secrets posted here that were eye-catching or aesthetically pleasing and had all the text perfectly visible.

[paperghost]

This is a weird thing to fixate on but the censoring effect here is pretty clever.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm told it's popular with Mormons who aren't allowed to look at porn, so what you do is you take an innocent picture of a woman wearing very little and strategically cover every scrap of fabric with these bubbles so that your brain reads it as a nude. I have no first hand sources to back that up, but at the very least enough people online believe it for a search for "mormon bubbling" to return a bunch of these types of images.