[ SECRET POST #6591 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6591 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #942.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

da

It's become politicized in humans, but the principle is the same in all sorts of animals. And bringing up dogs was in no way more outlandish that bringing up congenitally sterile humans, or clownfish, as trans ideologues have.

In related news, the Freedom from Religion Foundation recently dissolved its honorary board, over a difference of opinion about where their responsibilities lay. The obvious disagreement was over whether it was hurtful to trans people to print a biologist's essay, pointing out that there are (still) only two sexes. https://secularhumanism.org/exclusive/biology-is-not-bigotry/ The essay was a rebuttal to one claiming a woman is anybody who says she is one, which was a bridge too far for one of the scientists on the board.

[(Anonymous)]

No it was very stupid. I didn't quote the whole thing. Legit scientists are in disagreement but it's all about dogs, simple as that. God, and these people vote.

[(Anonymous)]

Once again, you provide no evidence. Merely upset.

[(Anonymous)]

I posted a link to a scientific paper yesterday, you dolt. I don't see you posting anything. Of course I am upset, these stupid people are around me. They are sure, they feel smart. I include you in they because YOU didn't provide any evidence and is a lazy dolt. I'm spending too much time typing this shit on you already. Go a day back, you lazy 'dogs are people' caw.

[(Anonymous)]

Insults, strawmen, one 40+ year old article that should make everyone wonder what the peer review was smoking, and another article about an intersex woman who managed to carry a pregnancy to term just like any endosex individual would ... is hardly convincing evidence of a third sex.

Given the variable quality of those, I'm not inclined to read another link that was posted in the thread that got frozen yesterday. And, as you seem quite sure that there *must* be more than two sexes, I don't see how providing you with links in this thread would make any difference.