[ SECRET POST #6596 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6596 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________




08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #943.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[iff_and_xor]

Thanks!

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, but that’s so frustrating to me. It feels like smashing together several distinct issues as well as ignoring the difference between “I choose to” and “everyone should”.

[(Anonymous)]

da

But I mostly see it in the context of "fiction is not automatically an invitation to hold forth on the writer, their morals / behaviors / politics / comments."

The same way some Christians want to turn any conversation about anything into a conversation about Jesus, people who've absorbed the pop version of critical theory seem to think "the right" way to engage with all media, socially, is by turning it into a conversation about what they can tell is Problematic, and why the author did that. And pretending like passing judgment together or fighting about it if you can't agree accomplishes anything. It ... gets similarly tiresome.